dys·func·tion /dɪsˈfʌŋkʃən/ [dis-fuhngk-shuhn]–noun
1. Medicine/Medical . malfunctioning, as of an organ or structure of the body. 2. any malfunctioning part or element: the dysfunctions of the country's economy. 3. Sociology . a consequence of a social practice or behavior pattern that undermines the stability of a social system.

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Embrace The Penis

It's time for a rant.

This post talks about the penis.

I was just surfing the net, reading blogs, when I came across a blog in which one of the top ten posts that this person has written is a rant in which they tell all men that uncircumsized penises are disgusting and that they need to get snipped.

Are you f***ing serious?!?!

With all of the equality and respect that we demand from men, this person (and many people who commented) believes that all of the men in the world need to have their foreskins removed.

Now! It is one thing to have a personal preference...maybe even in some more risque blogs to share that preference with your followers (something that I find too intimate and uncomfortable to be discussing with my readers... in my opinion a penis is a penis is a penis is a penis) but IN NO WAY does anyone have the right to tell EVERY MAN in the world that having a foreskin is 'disgusting' or 'revolting' and that they need to have them 'snipped'.

As if men don't have it hard enough?

It is obvious (most of the time) the size of a woman's breasts. They hang out right in front of our chests, and although we cover them with clothing, they make their presence known.

A man hides his penis inside underwear and pants, and zipper bulges aren't any real indication of size. Especially not any indication of pro-non circumsized.

This blogger (I'm not going to name this person because I'm not interested in a blog-war, I just need to rant) writes that these 'types' of men should "come with an indicator", as if every uncircumsized man should wear a sign or a t-shirt that says 'comes with foreskin'.

This is disgusting.

I am so pissed off right now, you have no idea.

Image from here

People propagate certain stereotypes for the pros and cons of circumcision, but at the end of the day you need to do your own research.

Cosmetically, there should be NO DIFFERENCE. We shouldn't even discuss our men's penises (as if we are discussing the features on our cars). It is a private matter. I wouldn't want anyone to be talking about the size or shape of my vagina. My labia. Clitoris. Even my pubic hair-styling-preferences.

For the love of GOD! How can we expect men to be proud of their bodies if we propagate a stereotype that men are broken when they are born and need to be fixed.

There is a crapload of research for the medical sides of both arguments, but at the end of the day, when you remove a man's underwear, he obviously finds you attractive enough to be intimate.

Unless it has two heads, you should be excited that he wants to share it with you - period.


jedi starrunner said...

Snipped or not, if its love, its love and that shouldn't matter.

I'd be super sad if boyfriend didn't want to be with me anymore because my belly button was an innie instead of an outie, or because my nipples were not his taste etc.


Bth said...

Firstly, thanks for stopping by my blog, and having a read - and commenting on my post. Thought I'd drop by and visit your blog. :)
Secondly, I thought this was a great ranting post, and totally agree with you! P.s. Really like your new layout!

dys·func·tion said...

@Bth: Thank you for coming by. I'm glad you liked the post and the new layout, I hope you come back and visit again.

Anonymous said...

I think you are 100% correct. The man I am inlove with now is not and doesn't differ from any other man Ive been with. Love is LOVE and you are right. If they want to be that way its all personal preference. How do women except men not to be judgmental about how we look! AMAZING POST!

There was an error in this gadget

Recent Posts